Flexural Strength Of Provisional Restorative Materials Upon Aging

Supichaya Srisontisuk, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Juntavee

Abstract


Background: Aging may affect strength of provisional restorative materials.

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of aging on strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (Hp-PMMA), auto-polymerized (Ap) PMMA, bis-phenyl-glycidyl dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) containing either PMMA or acrylate resin.

Methods: Two hundred-ten bars (2x2x25mm) were fabricated from Hp-PMMA: Major C&B (M); Ap-PMMA: Unifast™ (U); Bis-acryl: Protemp™ (P), Luxatemp® (L); PMMA-CAD/CAM: Telio® CAD (T), artBloc® (R); and acrylate-CAD/CAM: Vita CAD Temp® (V). Each was divided into aging- (A) and non-aging- (N) groups (n=15 each). A-groups were thermo-cycled (5°C v.s 55°C, 30 sec each, 5000 cycles). Flexural strength was determined in universal testing machine at 1 mm/min crosshead speed, 50N/min loading. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni’s test was determined for significant difference (α=0.05). Weibull statistics were determined for Weibull modulus (m), and characteristics strength (σo). Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were examined for fracture surfaces.

Results: The values (means±sd (MPa), m, σo) were (84.62± 3.73, 25.23, 86.53) and (84.05± 6.39, 13.21, 87.28) for VN and VA, (133.49± 4.32, 34.09, 135.54) and (123.11± 4.55, 28.76, 125.35) for TN and TA, (120.59± 6.94, 19.01, 123.84) and (119.96± 6.90, 19.21, 123.16) for RN and RA, (94.35± 4.07, 25.82, 96.24) and (93.07± 3.22, 32.19, 94.58) for PN and PA, (110.60± 6.20, 19.99, 113.44) and (97.23± 7.77, 13.82, 100.78) for LN and LA, (114.30± 5.21, 23.90, 116.79) and (112.21± 5.70, 19.86, 115.13) for MN and MA, and (89.45± 2.96, 32.77, 90.88) and (84.96± 5.33, 17.66, 87.42) for UN and UA respectively. T revealed the highest, whereas V possessed the lowest strength for both N- and A- condition. Aging significantly affected strength.

Conclusions: Flexural strengths were differences among materials. PMMA-CAD/CAM possessed the highest, while acrylate-CAD/CAM possessed the lowest. Hp-PMMA showed better strength than Ap-PMMA. Bis-acryl resin was stronger than Ap-PMMA. Aging reduced strength for all materials tested.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Almeida, C. S., et al. (2016). "Effect of an experimental silica-nylon reinforcement on the fracture load and flexural strength of bisacrylic interim partial fixed dental prostheses". J. Prosthet. Dent, 115(3), 301-05.

Alt, V., et al. (2011). "Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations". Dent Mater, 27(4), 339-47.

Anusavice, K. J., et al. (2013). "Phillips' science of dental materials", Elsevier Health Sciences.

Astudillo-Rubio, D., et al. (2018). "Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis". PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0193162.

Blank, J. (2012). "A Clinical Update on Temporization and Definitive Restoration Placement". ADA CERP, May 2012, 1-12.

Burns, D. R., et al. (2003). "A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics". J. Prosthet. Dent, 90(5), 474-97.

Christensen, G. J. (2004). "Making provisional restorations easy, predictable and economical". J Am Dent Assoc, 135(5), 625-27.

Clenaland, C. M., et al. (2012). "Fabrication of provisional crowns and bridges". ADA CERP, Febuary 21, 2012, 1-26.

Ender, A., et al. (2016). "Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays". Dent Mater, 32(2), e22-e29.

Gujjari, A., et al. (2013). "Color stability and flexural strength of poly (methyl methacrylate) and bis-acrylic composite based provisional crown and bridge auto-polymerizing resins exposed to beverages and food dye: An in vitro study". Indian J Dent Res, 24(2), 172-77.

Gülce, A., et al. (2017). "Comparison of Flexural Strength of Different CAD/CAM PMMA‐Based Polymers". J Prosthodont, 0(0).

Hamza, T. A., et al. (2014). "Effect of polyhedral silsesquioxane (POSS) on the flexural strength and color of interim materials". J. Prosthet. Dent, 112(2), 228-34.

Haselton, D. R., et al. (2005). "Color stability of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins". J. Prosthet. Dent, 93(1), 70-75.

Hyde, J. D., et al. (2007). "Provisional crown failures in dental school predoctoral clinics". J Dent Educ, 71(11), 1414-9.

Iso10477:2004 "Dentistry. Polymer- based crown and bridge materials".

Kadiyala, K. K., et al. (2016). "Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Thermocycled Interim Resin Materials Used in Prosthetic Rehabilitation- An In-vitro Study". J Clin Diagn Res, 10(9), ZC91-ZC95.

Kerby, R. E., et al. (2013). "Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials". J. Prosthet. Dent, 110(1), 21-28.

Pascutti, F. P. N., et al. (2017). "Evaluation in vitro of Flexural Strength of Three Resins for Provisional Crowns in CAD/CAM System". J Dent Sci, 5(2), 75-81.

Patras, M., et al. (2012). "Management of Provisional Restorations' Deficiencies: A Literature Review". J Esthet Restor Dent, 24(1), 26-38.

Poonacha, V., et al. (2013). "In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics". J Clin Exp Dent, 5(5), e212-e17.

Rayyan, M. M., et al. (2015). "Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually". J. Prosthet. Dent, 114(3), 414-19.

Santosa, R. (2007). "Provisional restoration options in implant dentistr". Aust Dent J, 52(3), 234-42.

Sodata, P., et al. (2017). "Optimization of Adhesive Pastes for Dental Caries Prevention". AAPS PharmSciTech, 18(8), 3087-96.

Stawarczyk, B., et al. (2016). "Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites". J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 55, 1-11.

Vichi, A., et al. (2004). "Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging". Dent Mater, 20(6), 530-34.

Yanikoğlu, N. D., et al. (2014). "Flexural Strength of Temporary Restorative Materials Stored in Different Solutions". J Stomatol, 4, 291-98.

Yao, J., et al. (2014). "Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling". J. Prosthet. Dent, 112(3), 649-57.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.