Factors Affecting Teachers’ Decision To Participate In Professional Development Activities In Prey Tralach Commune, Battambang Provice Of Cambodia

Kim Koem, Somsak Srisontisuk


The importance of world education for development has made some remarkably progresses in recent years, with international organizations tackle to increase the professional capacity of local teachers and staffs. Students’ learning achievement depends very much on teachers’ experiences and effectiveness relating to the professional development experiences that support their learning. This study aims to identify teachers’ teaching experience characteristics involving in professional learning activities by examining the key factors affecting teachers’ decision to participate in the professional development activities (PD). The study addresses two research questions consisting of: 1) How do teachers attend the training programs or PD offered to them based on their characteristics? 2) What are the key factors affecting teachers’ decision to get involved in PD or training programs? The research was conducted using quantitative and qualitative methods through directed interviews and survey questionnaires distributed among teachers in person with 103 teachers from 17 schools in commune, namely Prey Tralach by sampling and purposively. The collected data was articulated in descriptive way to show the respondents demographic characteristics such as gender, age, education background, teaching experiences, and grade level of teaching assignment. Logistic Regression was used to analyze to find the key factors affecting teachers’ decision to participate in PD activities. The results revealed that the key factors affecting teachers to attend PD activities included teachers’ characteristics; teaching grade level of assignments, while external factor; insufficient funding/finance in statistically significant way (p<0.05). PD for teachers is need for professional growth and plays important topic in education improvement in Cambodia.

Full Text:



Al-Behaisi, S. (2011). The Impact of Professional Development on Teacher Practices and Teaching Efficacy.

Anne Lemaistre. (2016). Unesco in Cambodia today Report 2014-2015.

Bayar, A. (2014). The Components of Effective Professional Development Activities in terms of Teachers ’ Perspective, 6(2), 319–327.

Bayindir, N. (2009). Teachers’ perception levels of activities directed towards professional progress. Education, 130(1), p22-29.

Boles, K. C., & Troen, V. (2007). How to Improve Professional Practice. In Principal (p. 50).

Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning : Mapping the Terrain. American Education Research Association, 33(8), 3–15.

Coldwell, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189–198.

Evens, M., Elen, J., Larmuseau, C., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Promoting the development of teacher professional knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 244–258.

Jovanova-Mitkovska, S. (2010). The need of continuous professional teacher development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2921–2926.

Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170.

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.

Lohman, M. C. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ engagement in informal learning activities.Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3), 141–156.

MoEYS. (2016). Public Education Statistics & Indicators (Vol. 2017).

MoEYS, T. (2015). Teeacheer Policy Action Plan.

Ozer, N., & Beycioglu, K. (2010). The relationship between teacher professional development and burnout. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4928–4932.

OECD, & EIA. (2008). Executive summary. New Directions for Youth Development, 2008(120), 7–12.

Phin, C. (2014). Challenges of Cambodian Teachers in Contributing to Human and Social Development: Are They Well-Trained? International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(5), 344–348.

Royal Governmant of Cambodia. (2014). National Strategic Development Plan 2014-2018.

Dy, S. S. (2004). Strategies and Policies for Basic Educaiton in Cambodia: Historical Perspective. International Education Journal, 5(1), 90–94.

Shafer, F. K. (2008). An investigation of selected factors that influence middle-level teachers’ professional development choices.

Tanang, H., & Abu, B. (2014). Teacher Professionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi , Indonesia, 3(2), 25–42.

Torff, B., & Sessions, D. (2008). Factors associated with teachers’ attitudes about professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 123–133.

UNESCO.Cambodia. (2015). Cambodia Education for All 2015 National Review Royal Government of Cambodia National Education For All Committee The National Education For All 2015 Review Report.

UNESCO. (2012). Education for All: Youth and skills: Putting education to work. EFA Global Monitoring Report.

UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030. World Education Forum 2015.


  • There are currently no refbacks.