Study Program Accreditation: Importance and Performance

Amrun Rosyid, Ikhsan Budi Riharjo


The purpose of this is to analysis importance and performance level of study programs in the accreditation process. This is a qualitative study and analysis start from calculate the gap between the level of importance and the performance of seven standards for the assessment of accreditation of study programs. The analysis was continued by using cause effect diagram to find out the causes of several problems in the study program accreditation process. The results of the study show that standards 1, 2 and 5 have the highest level of importance. While based on the guidelines from BAN PT, standards 7, 3, 4, and 6 are the standards with the highest weighting ratings. Gap from the biggest to the smallest gap is for standards 7, 3, 6, 4, 6, 2 and 1. Using Cause Effect Diagram can find out some of the causes of problems in the accreditation process and also provide some recommendations.

Full Text:



Dewi, Y. K. (2018) ‘Successful Supporting Factors For The Application Of Quality Guarantee Systems In College’, Business Management Journal, 14(1), pp. 37–48.

Ginanjar, D. (2019) 89 PTS Jatim Belum Terakreditasi, 50 Persen Berdiri Lebih dari 2 Tahun. Available at: 2-tahun/ (Accessed: 8 August 2019).

Miles, M. B., Huhermen, A. M. and Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Souce Book. 3rd edn. New York: Sage.

Sugiyarto (2018) 142 Perguruan Tinggi dan 204 Prodi di Jatim Belum Terakreditasi - Halaman 2 - Available at: belum-terakreditasi?page=2 (Accessed: 8 August 2019).

Sugiyono, Sutopo and Nuryanto, A. (2012) Laporan Penelitian Studi Evaluasi Performance Program Studi Pgsd Pasca Akreditasi. Jakarta: BAN PT.

Wibowo, U. B. (2010) Strategi Percepatan Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana. Surabaya: PGRI Adibuana Press University.


  • There are currently no refbacks.