EFL Blended-teaching Practice: A Case Study Of VULC

Josemari Cordova


University lecturers are faced with challenges of student engagement in EFL classrooms. The distractions caused by the use of smartphones and other electronic devices are issues that need not only be addressed but also maximized in the delivery of lessons. Hence, this case study was undertaken to examine the blended-teaching practices of Vongchavalitkul University Language Center (VULC) lecturers, specifically the use Google Classroom. It also examined the digital devices used, the different educational applications integrated in Google, and the frequency of using the different applications were descriptively analyzed. In addition, the lecturers’ opinions in the blended teaching were also discussed. The use of mobile devices in classroom teaching will be part of the future EFL curriculum. This implies that teaching outside the designated lecture hour is part of blended-learning environment. It was found that VULC lecturers have not fully utilized most of Google Apps for Education and other digital applications in their blended teaching.

Full Text:



Amanda, I. and Katie, L. L., 2015. Google classroom for librarians: features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 32, pp. 1-3.

Deutsch, N. (2010). Instructor experiences with implementing technology in blended learning courses in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Phoenix. (Order No. 3429155) Digital tools for education reform. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30353746.

September 5, 2018.

Fenton, W. (2017). Google Classroom could bridge a gap in online learning. PC Magazine Digital Edition. August 2017.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughn, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles and guidelines. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Son.

Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Pulham, E., & Larsen, R. (2017). K-12 blended teaching readiness: Phase 1- Instrument development. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual University. Retrieved from

https://mvlri.org/research/publications/k-12-blended-teaching-readiness-instrumentdevelopment/ https://classroom.google.com/

Imbriale, R. (2013). Blended learning. Principal Leadership, 13(6), 30-34. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1006997

Johnson D., & Bremer, C. D. (2005). Communities of practice: A strategy for program improvement. Information Brief: Addressing Trends and Developments in Secondary Education, 4(3), 1-4. Retrieved from http://www.ncset.org/publications/viewdesc.asp?id=2349

Moukali, K.H. (2012). Factors that affect faculty attitudes toward adoption of technology-rich blended learning. University of Kansas.

Norberg, A., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A time based blended learning model. On the Horizon. 19. 207-216. 10.1108/10748121111163913.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 271. doi:10.1108/02637471311295405

Pulham, E., Graham, C.R., & Short, C.R. (2018) Generic vs. Modality-Specific Competencies for K-12 Online and Blended Teaching. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4 (1), 33-52.

Regis, D. (2016). The benefits of Google for Education in higher ed: Google for Education tools can foster collaboration and benefit learning on campus. University Business. Vol. 18, 1, January 2015. http://vlex.com/vid/the-benefits-of-google-557998662

Verapreyagoon, J. (2018). The development of blended-learning environment model for communicative language teaching using active learning to enhance creative communication skill and collaboration skills for undergraduate students (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Mahasarakham University.

Villalon, C. (2017). Influence of instructors’ attitudes, gender, and technology training when implementing blended learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix.


  • There are currently no refbacks.